Plan
Schemes
Centrally
Sponsored Schemes
The
following Centrally sponsored Schemes are being implemented
through the Department of Municipal administration.
INTEGRATED
DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL AND MEDIUM TOWNS (I.D.S.M.T)
Budget
allocation (2002-2003) Rs.375 Lakhs
The
objectives of this Scheme are improvement of infrastructure
facilities and creation of durable public assets in medium
and small towns thereby reducing migration to bigger cities
for jobs, decentralisation of economic growth and employment
opportunities, dispersion of Urbanisation, increase of availability
of sites for housing, commercial and industrial uses and
orderly development and promotion of resource generating
schemes for Urban Local Bodies. Till 1991 – 1992 the central
Government and state Government met the expenditure under
this scheme on 50:50 basis. The following 21 towns were
taken up with this pattern of assistance.
| 1. |
Kottayam
|
2. |
Guruvayur
|
3. |
Thrissur
|
4. |
Tirur |
| 5. |
Thalassery |
6. |
Changanassery |
7. |
Vadakara
|
8. |
Kayamkulm |
| 9. |
Manjeri |
10. |
Malappuram |
11. |
Thodupuzha |
12. |
Palakkad
|
| 13. |
Kannur
|
14. |
Neyyattinkara
|
15. |
Punalur
|
16. |
Kalpetta
|
| 17. |
Kasargod |
18. |
Pathanamthitta |
19. |
Chavakkad
|
20. |
Muvattupuzha
|
| 21. |
Shornur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
of India revised the ratio of central and state assistance
under this scheme to 60:40 with effect from 1-4-92. The
following towns were selected under the revised pattern
of assistance.
| 1. |
Alappuzha
|
2. |
Kollam
|
3. |
Cherthala |
| 4. |
Aluva |
5. |
Thiruvalla
|
6. |
Chalakudy |
In
August 1995 the Government of India again revised the guidelines
for implementation of the scheme. As per the revised guidelines,
the towns eligible for selection under the scheme is grouped
into the following 5 categories depending on the population
of the town as per 1991 census.
| Population |
Category |
| Less
than 20000 |
A |
| 20000-50000 |
B |
| 50000-100000 |
C |
| 100000-300000 |
D |
| 300000-500000 |
E |
The
pattern of financing of the projects is as follows:-
| Category
of towns |
Project
cost |
Central
Assistance available |
State
share to be provided |
Institutional
finance to be raised/other resources |
|
|
|
(Rupees
in Lakhs) |
|
| A |
100 |
48 |
32 |
20
(20%) |
| B |
200 |
90 |
60 |
50
(25%) |
| C |
350 |
100 |
100 |
100
(29%) |
| D |
550 |
210 |
140 |
200
(36%) |
| E |
750 |
270 |
180 |
300
(40%) |
The
Central and State share of assistance will be in the form
of grant. The following 13 towns have been selected under
the above pattern of financial assistance.
| 1. |
Kozhikode
|
2. |
Chengannur
|
3. |
Varkala
|
4. |
Nedumangad |
| 5. |
Kothamangalam |
6. |
Ottappalam
|
7. |
Pathanamthitta
|
8. |
Moovattupuzha
|
| 9. |
North
Paravur |
10. |
Kodungalloor |
11. |
Irinjalakkuda |
12. |
Pala |
| 13. |
Ponnani |
.
|
The
Corporation of Kozhikode and the Municipality of Chengannur,
Varkala, Pathanamthitta and Moovattupuzha have achieved
considerable progress in the implementation of the scheme.
North Paravr, Kodungalloor and Irinjalakuda were brought
under this scheme only last year and have not made tangible
physical achievements.
Government
of India have recently delegated the power to prioritise
the Municipal Bodies for bringing under this scheme to the
state government Accordingly it has been decided to bring
8 towns under this scheme within the next five years.
The
expenditure under the scheme during the previous year was
Rs. 448.63 lakhs against the actual budgetary allocation
of Rs.250/-. The additional fund required has been made
available by re-appropriation.
A
statement showing the name of I.D.S.M.T.Town, Project cost
Plan period and Fund released is attached herewith Annexure
II
MODERNISATION
OF SLAUGHTER HOUSES; (50% C.S.S)
Budget
Allocation (2002-2003)
RS
120 lakhs
The
objectives of the Scheme are:-
As
per the pattern of financial assistance, the Government
of India will extend 50% as grant; the balance 50% is to
be met by the State Government and the implementing agencies.
Government as per GO (Rt.) No.1338/2000/LAD dated 26.03.2000
have ordered that 50% assistance under this scheme will
be borne by the State Government and implementing Urban
Local Bodies on 50:50 basis.
The following
ULBs are brought under the scheme.
10. Thiruvananthapuram
11. Thiruvalla
12. Trippunithura
13. Thrissur
14. Irinjalakkuda
15. Angamally
16. Manchery
17. Malappuram
18. Kannur
10. Moovattupuzha
11. Kottayam
Thrissur
and Trippunithura municipalities have already commissioned
the project. In the corporation of Thiruvananthapuram and
in the municipalities of Irinjalakkuda and Manchery, the
projects are nearing completion. Three municipalities (Angamali
and Kannur) have not taken up the project yet. Therefore
it has been recommended to cancel the project sanctioned
to them.
The
proposals of the municipalities of Perumbavur, Chalakudy,
Kottayam, Changanassery, Kasargod and Malappuram (Revised)
are Pending before Government for sanction.
A statement showing the allocation and expenditure under
this scheme is attached herewith an Annexure III
SWARNA
JAYANTHI SHAHARI ROZGAR YOJANA (SJSRY)
Budget
allocation 600 Lakhs (2002-2003)
Government
of India has introduced. Swarna Jyanthi Shahari Rozgar Yojana
(SJSRY) to replace the existing poverty alleviation schemes
such as Nehru Rozgar yojana, Urban Basic Service for the
poor and Prime Minister’s Integrated Urban Poverty Eradication
Programme, with effect from 01-12-1997. The funding of the
scheme is on 75:25 basis between the Central and State Government.
This
scheme consists of two broad components viz. Urban Self-Employment
Programme (USEP) and Urban Wage Employment Programme (UWEP).
USEP has three distinct components—(1) Assistance to individual
Urban poor for setting up gainful self employment ventures
(2) assistance to group of Urban poor women for setting
up gainful self-employment ventures.
NATIONAL SLUM DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
Budget
allocation 1025 Lakhs
This 100% CSS
have been implemented from 1996-1997. The Local Bodies in
the Urban slum can take up the following types of infrastructure
development schemes. These activities can also be taken
up in areas where majority of beneficiaries belongs to identified
poor.
1.
Water supply
2. Storm water drains
3. Sewage
4. Community bath room and
toilet facilities
5. Individual low cost latrines
not exceeding Rs.2000/- per unit
6. Street lights
7. Widening and paving of
existing lanes
8. Community infrastructure
like small roads, footpaths, informal education centres.
So
far Government of India has released a total amount of RS
4841.68 lakhs under this Scheme to our State. The State
Government has released the amount to the Urban Local Bodies
as detailed below.
| Year
|
Amount
Released by Government of India |
Amount
Released by State Government |
|
|
(RS
In lakhs) |
| 1996-1997 |
727 |
160 |
| 1997-1998 |
847 |
800 |
| 1998-1999 |
929 |
800 |
| 1999-2000 |
1028 |
1300 |
| 2000-2001 |
258.68 |
1000 |
| 2001-2002 |
1025 |
529.68 |
| 2002-2003 |
|
1025 |
| Total
|
4814.68 |
4814.68 |
The
Executive Director, Kudumbasree is the nodal Office in respect
of N.S.D.P & S.J.S.R.Y
Externally
Aided Project
KOCHI
URBAN POVERTY REDUCTION SCHEME
Budget
allocation – 950 Lakh (2002-2003)
Besides the above on going schemes, one externally aided
programme namely., Kochi Urban Poverty Reduction Scheme
is being implemented in the Corporation of Kochi. The Programme
is implemented with assistance from Overseas Development
Agency (UK) in the form of grant. The objective of the programme
is to improve the living conditions of about 1.95 lakhs
of Urban poor in Kochi Corporation area. Improvement or
up-gradation of water supply, sanitation, access roads,
street lighting, garbage removal, health care and community
development through education, training, and economic development
activities are the major activities envisaged under the
project. Implementation of the first phase of the project
has already been started in selected pockets of the Corporation.
The Corporation of Kochi is implementing this programme
under the direct supervision Local Self Government Department
is implementing this Programme.For DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION